Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. La Prade v. Grantham

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1926No. Civil No. 2522PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

On the fifteenth day of March, 1926, one Maurice Grantham appeared before J. P. Mallory, who was the duly elected, qualified and acting justice of the peace, Tucson precinct, Pima county, Arizona, and swore to a criminal complaint against E. G. Grantham. The substance of the complaint is as follows:

“That one E. G. Grantham on or about the 15th day of March, 1926, at Tucson precinct, county and state aforesaid, committed a felony, to wit, failure to provide for minor child, as follows, to wit:
“The said E. G. Grantham did then and there, wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously, and without lawful…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Henry v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Ex parte SimpsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Oswald v. Minneapolis & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Ex parte McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  5. In Re RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oswald v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Jones v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Chitwood v. EymanArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Griswold v. GomesArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rivera-Sanchez v. CristDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API