Senter v. Davis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth District, Sacramento County. The defendant appealed. The facts are stated by the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
The complaint seems to have been framed with a view to alternate relief—specific performance, if by the rules of equity the plaintiff is entitled thereto, and if not, damages at law for a breach of the contract. The Court below was of the opinion that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance, and rendered judgment accordingly. The case comes here upon the judgment roll, without testimony or findings of fact, and the only point made by the defendant is, that the case made by the complaint does not entitle the plaintiffs to the relief which he has obtained.
The plaintiff is a newspaper…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Duff v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by26 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Wait v. Kern River Mining, Milling, & Developing Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Gilfallan v. GilfallanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.