Legal Opinion

Newport Mining Co. v. City of Ironwood

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1915No. Docket No. 124PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error to Gogebic; Cooper, J. Assumpsit by Newport Mining Company against the city of Ironwood for the recovery back of taxes paid under protest. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

(after stating the facts). 1. It was held in Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Babcock, 204 U. S. 585, 27 Sup. Ct. 326, cited by plaintiff, that in an independent proceeding attacking the judgment of an assessing board it is improper to cross-examine the members in an attempt to exhibit confusion in their minds as to the method by which the result was reached. It was further held that, in a suit to. declare void assessments, the court would not consider complaints as to the results reached by a State board of assessors, except those based on fraud or the adoption of a fundamentally wrong principle. It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Merrill v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. General v. Pioneer Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Solomon v. Township of OscodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Auditor General v. HughittMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HancockNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hamilton v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Twenty-Two Charlotte, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Fisher-New Center Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Moran v. Grosse Pointe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API