Lundbom v. City of Manistee
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Bill to restrain the collection of a paving tax. Complainants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The bill in this case was filed to-restrain the collection of taxes assessed against property *171owned by complainants. This tax was assessed for the paving of Kosciusko* Eighth* and Yine streets in said city. The assessment was made on the 24th of July* 1888* and the bill was filed on the 13th of September, 1890.
A large number of objections are made to the proceedings* all of which have been carefully considered; but, if it be conceded that there are irregularities which would have proved fatal to the proceedings if the complainants had acted promptly* we do not think they are entitled to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Byram v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Ritchie v. City of South TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
3Cited by21 opinions
- Erickson v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Atwell v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Moore v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Farr v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Campbell v. City of PlymouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.