Brown v. City of Grand Rapids
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.)' Bill to remove a cloud caused by the sale of complainant’s land in satisfaction of a special assessment, etc. Defendant appeals. The' facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The complainant is the owner of lots 1, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, and the west 54 feet of lot 11, of J. H. Brown's addition to the city of Grand Rapids. These lots were platted by complainant 66 feet wide by 165 feet ■deep, and are on the south side of Wealthy avenue, between Grandville avenue on the east and Oakland avenue on the west.
Wealthy avenue, between Grandville and Oakland avenues, up to June 7, 1886, was only 33 feet in width. At that date, the common council of the city of Grand Rapids adopted a resolution requesting the city surveyor to furnish it with a description of the property…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peninsula Iron & Lumber Co. v. Township of Crystal FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Williams v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Comstock v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by28 opinions
- Smith v. CarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Blades v. Genesee County Drain DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Marks v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Campbell v. City of PlymouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re Petition of MacOmb Cty. Drain Com'rMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.