Legal Opinion

Martin v. Henderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1954No. Civ. 8284PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, commenced an action against defendant Henderson and several fictitious defendants, the complaint stating two causes of action: the first to quiet title to a house and lot; and the second to recover an overpayment alleged to have been made by plaintiffs to defendants. Defendant'Henderson filed an answer substantially admitting the allegations of plaintiffs’ first cause of action, denying the material allegations of the second cause of action, and also filed a cross-complaint against plaintiffs stating two causes of action: the first being on an alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hansen v. BurfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Wright v. LoaizaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Swanson v. HempsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyd v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Jackson v. PancakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Cargill v. AchzigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Dwight v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API