Swanson v. Hempstead
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
We find the judgment in this case to be based on findings which are inconsistent with the theory of the pleadings. We recognize that in the administration of justice pleadings are a means to an end, not an end in themselves, and that an issue which has been tried and determined should not be removed from the foundation of the resulting judgment just because it was not an issue within the framework of the pleadings. Where, however, the judgment rests upon the determination of issues which were neither foreshadowed by the pleadings nor understood by the parties to be in dispute at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Kisling v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Carter v. Boone County Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, a Partnership v. The Telex Corporation, a Corporation, and Telex Computer Products, Inc., AcorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Rader v. ThrasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Blount v. Westinghouse Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Estate of RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.