Legal Opinion

Wright v. Loaiza

California Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1918No. S. F. No. 8413PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action was brought against W. Y. Loaiza and Dolores Loaiza, brother and sister, to recover a balance of $465.30 claimed to be due to N. Gray and Company, a corporation, plaintiff’s assignor, for materials furnished and services rendered in connection with the funeral of a deceased brother of the defendants. The total amount of the bill was $615.30. The arrangements for the funeral were made by W. Y. Loaiza, who acted for himself and his sister, Dolores. The sister had authorized him so to do, stating that she would pay all of the charge over $150. These facts were communicated to N. Gray…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Continental Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Furlow Pressed Brick Co. v. Balboa Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hansen v. BurfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Tillson v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API