J.C. Booth v. Peavey Company Commodity Services
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s case. The plaintiff appeals contending that he presented evidence from which the jury could have found that the defendant had “churned” plaintiff’s commodity account for its benefit rather than that of the plaintiff. We affirm.
While the point was not argued by the parties, we feel it necessary to consider first whether an investor has a right to institute an action against a dealer for churning a commodity account. Such an action is not specifically provided for by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1968
- Goodman v. H. Hentz & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- Anderson v. Francis I. duPont & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Stevens v. Abbott, Proctor & PaineDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
- Maheu v. Reynolds & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Robert Shad, Molly Shad, and Samantha Shad v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., a Corporation Milton Ponitz and Lee McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,368 Joe G. Moody v. Bache & Co., Incorporated and Bob PetersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.