Legal Opinion
Goodman v. H. Hentz & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 13, 1967No. 65 C 2079PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NAPOLI, District Judge.
I
FACTS
For purposes of deciding the motion of defendants to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the allegations of the complaint must be accepted as fact. Plaintiffs allege that they were customers of defendant Hentz & Co., a partnership, which is a registered broker-dealer and commission merchant with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Exchange Authority, and a member firm of the principal securities exchanges and commodity contract markets. Also named as defendants are five resident partners of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Wheeldin v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kardon v. National Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Edgar Robert Errion, Also Known as E. R. Errion and Bob Errion Amy Errion, Violet Kellerstraus, and C. W. Williamson v. Marguerite L. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,861 Gerald Mansbach v. Prescott, Ball & TurbenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,714 Edwin J. Herpich v. Robert H. Wallace, Jack E. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1968
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.