Legal Opinion

Turnbull v. Richardson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1888PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Alpena. (Emeriek, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. . The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, J.

It is not the province of this Court to set aside the verdicts of juries upon the ground that their verdicts are excessively large or small. This is a discretionary power, and resides, under our practice, with the circuit judge. The only questions we can review upon writ of error and bill of exceptions are those of law which have been passed upon by the trial court.

The errors assigned upon the record in this case relate principally to the rulings of the trial court holding that certain hypothetical questions were proper to be propounded to •expert witnesses.

The plaintiffs are attorneys and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. People v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cowley v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Beaubien v. CicotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. HamptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. De Haan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Delahunt v. FintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Zoldoske v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API