Goldman v. Century Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This case * involves a fire insurance policy. The first question is one of interpretation, whether or not certain protection was afforded under the policy. If not, the second question arises, whether or not the policy should be reformed to include such protection. The plaintiffs, Goldman brothers, are the insured. The defendants are the insurers.
The Goldman brothers (hereafter referred to as the Goldmans) conducted a coal business on Garfield avenue in the city of Detroit. The questions presented with respect to the policy require that the premises be described in some detail. Two street…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Consumers Power Co. v. County of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Emery v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Service v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Detroit Iron & Steel Co. v. Detroit Gray Iron Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Urick v. BurgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by35 opinions
- Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Rood v. General Dynamics Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- I. C. v. StockX, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Kukla v. National Distillers Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.