Cluett v. Rosenthal
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Submitted on briefs January 3, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Garnishment proceedings. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
On the 25th day of June, 1892, the principal defendants, Sol and Sam Rosenthal, executed to the garnishee defendant, Gates L. Rosenthal, a trust mortgage to secure $15,800 of alleged indebtedness of the mortgagors, which consisted of $1,850 to the Union National Bank, $9,000 to Gates L. Rosenthal, $2,950 to Rosen Bros., and $2,000 to Ben Kersberg, of Kansas City. The mortgage covered the entire stock of Rosenthal Bros., together with their books of account, credits, evidences of debt, rights of action, and bills and accounts receivable. The defendant took possession under the mortgage very…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Commonwealth v. TibbettsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Kendall v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. MathersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1891
- Rosenthal v. DickermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. BahodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Lebel v. SwincickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. LockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.