Legal Opinion

Trager v. Thor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1994No. 96434, (Calendar No. 12)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

Today we are asked to consider which theories of liability are appropriate for an action against one in temporary possession of a domestic animal that inflicts injuries while in such possession. The Court of Appeals allowed the plaintiffs’ common-law strict liability and negligence claims against a temporary caretaker of a dog to survive the caretaker’s motion for summary disposition. Because we hold that the temporary caretaker in this case did not possess the dog with the requisite proprietary control to be deemed the dog’s owner or keeper, we reverse that portion of the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Buczkowski v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Arnold v. LairdWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hancock v. FinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. McEvoy v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  5. Knowles v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hoffner v. LanctoeMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Jividen v. LawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Groncki v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hiner v. MojicaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API