Silva v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 12(b)(1), or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(4). The Plaintiff seeks the value of 103 parrots (as well as the value of their potential progeny) that were seized by the Government in a sting operation. Because, in this instance, this Court does not possess jurisdiction to hear claims for money damages associated with the seizure of property…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Paalan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Gary v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Trudeau v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Awad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.