Legal Opinion

Gary v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 10, 2005No. 03-1245CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s supplemental motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Howard V. Gary and M Securities Investment, Inc., d/b/a Howard Gary & Company (“M Securities”), filed a complaint in this court on May 21, 2003, seeking $5 million in damages based upon the following counts: (I) an alleged oral contract between Mr. Gary and the United States, (II) an alleged implied-in-faet contract between Mr. Gary and the United States, and (III) an alleged uncompensated…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. SGS-92-X003 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Monument Realty LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. Mendez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Snyder & Associates Aquisitions LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API