Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Ramirez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 6, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*954Claimant, a truck loader, was discharged by his supervisor after failing to report to work without notice on three consecutive days in March 2006. After a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge, citing claimant’s inconsistent testimony and prior statements to Department of Labor representatives, found that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his job due to misconduct. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed, prompting this appeal by claimant.
We affirm. “It is well settled that an employee’s unauthorized absence from work may…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of IskhakovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of GlowinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of KesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Claim of TahatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of SyedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of AtsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009