Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Roe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 14, 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1106Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 31, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s finding that claimant, a coordinator for a temporary employment agency for nurses and home health aides, was discharged from her employment due to misconduct. An employee’s unauthorized absence from work has been held to constitute misconduct that disqualifies the claimant from receiving…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Claim of TahatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of BritterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of RiversAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of Malcolm (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re the Claim of KirilytchevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of KirilytchevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.