Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Syed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 16, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 19, 2007, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s finding that claimant, a sales associate, was discharged from his employment due to misconduct. “It is well established that an employee’s unauthorized absence from work may constitute disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Tahat [Commissioner of Labor], 58 AD3d 921, 921…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Claim of TahatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re the Claim of ChiouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Malcolm (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API