Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Iskhakov
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 28, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*873Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 12, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment as an ambulette driver due to misconduct. It is well settled that an unauthorized absence from work or failure to comply with the employer’s known call-in policy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of RamseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re the Claim of GlowinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of JimenezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of VegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re the Claim of JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of MercureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Claim of TahatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of JaquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of Yura (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.