Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Atson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 23, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

We affirm. Preliminarily, we note that whether an employee has engaged in disqualifying misconduct is a factual question for the Board to decide and its determination will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Peterson [Commissioner of Labor], 32 AD3d 610, 610 [2006]). Notably, an employee’s failure to comply with the reasonable request of an employer may constitute misconduct disqualifying him or her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see Matter of Miles [Commissioner of Labor], 54 AD3d 467, 467-468 [2008]; Matter of Guagliardo [Commissioner of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GuagliardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re Claim of TahatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. In re the Claim of PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re the Claim of MilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. In re the Claim of RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API