Legal Opinion
Kradel v. Fox River Tractor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 24, 2002No. 99-4069, 00-3146PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Harry Kradel was injured in 1994 while operating a forage harvester. He and his wife, Marilene Kradel, filed this product liability suit in Pennsylvania state court in 1996, naming, inter alia, the original manufacturer and its corporate successors, Piper Industries, Inc. (“Piper”) and the Hiniker Company (“Hiniker”), as defendants. The case was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania based on diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Hiniker and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Sarah Borse v. Piece Goods Shop, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rosener v. Majestic Management, Inc. (In Re OODC, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Forrest v. Beloit Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Van Doren v. Coe Press Equipment Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Gucciardi v. Bonide Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Dale v. Webb Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.