Legal Opinion

Dale v. Webb Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-1109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Julius Dale, Jr. brought this action against defendant Webb Corporation seeking damages for injuries he sustained while operating a plate bending roll machine that was designed, manufactured and sold by Reed Engineering Company. The plaintiff alleges that Webb Corporation, as a successor in interest to Reed Engineering Company and under the Pennsylvania product line exception to the general rule of successor non-liability, is liable for his injuries. Presently before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment on this issue. For the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schmidt v. Boardman Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API