Legal Opinion
Forrest v. Beloit Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 20, 2003No. CIV.A.00-CV-5032PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KAUFFMAN, District Judge.
In this product liability diversity action, Plaintiff Paul R. Forrest seeks damages from Defendants Beloit Corporation (“Beloit”) and Harnischfeger Industries, Inc. (“HII”). 1 Now before the Court is Defendant HII’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the Motion.
I. Background
Viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the relevant facts are as follows. On November 29, 1999, acting within the course and scope of his employment at Jefferson-Smurfit Corporation, Plaintiff severely injured his left arm…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Armbruster v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- In Re Total Containment, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Fizzano Brothers Concrete Products, Inc. v. XLN, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Fizzano Bros. Concrete Products, Inc. v. XLN, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- MPI Acquisition, LLC v. NorthcuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.