Legal Opinion

Keegan v. First Bank of Sioux Falls

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1991No. 17111PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Circuit Judge.

Gunnar Mertz (Mertz) takes this intermediate appeal from a trial court order suppressing certain evidence pertaining to damages in his claim against lawyer Robert J. McDowell (McDowell) and the law firm of Boyce, Murphy, McDowell and Greenfield (the law firm). We conclude that the trial court’s ruling was premature and reverse its order.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Julie Keegan (Keegan) brought suit in 1984 against Mertz, McDowell and the estate of C.L. Anderson (Anderson). The claim arose from transactions surrounding a bank in Wibaux, Montana. Mertz cross-claimed against McDowell…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Peters v. HoisingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Thomas v. St. Mary's Roman Catholic ChurchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kressly v. ThebergeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wand v. BekkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Keegan v. First Bank of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sporleder v. Van LiereSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Cody v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Von Sternberg v. CaffeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API