Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1977No. 11714PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZASTROW, Justice (on reassignment).
From a verdict and judgment for defendant-seller (Wildcat Cave, Inc.) denying damages in an action for deceit and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiffs-purchasers (Schmidts) appeal. We affirm.
On March 31, 1973, Wildcat Cave, Inc. contracted to sell certain real and personal property to the Schmidts. The real property consisted of an 1.65-acre lot and an 80-acre tract of land on which a tourist attraction known as Wildcat Cave was located. The owners of Wildcat Cave, Inc., Mr. and Mrs. Stanley Wallberg, lived in a mobile home on what they thought was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Russell v. Industrial Transportation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
- Dwyer v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Dawe v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Stormo v. StrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.