Sporleder v. Van Liere
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert Sporleder (Sporleder) brought a cause of action against Merle Van Liere and En-R-G Max, Inc. (collectively referred to as Van Liere), claiming implied contract, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud and deceit. The claims of unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud and deceit were submitted to the jury, while the court directed a verdict on the implied contract claim. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Sporleder for $320,000 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. 1
[¶ 2] We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Dwyer v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Roth v. Farner-Bocken Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Biegler v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Miller v. JacobsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Prairie Lakes Health Care System, Inc. v. WookeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.