Legal Opinion

Sporleder v. Van Liere

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert Sporleder (Sporleder) brought a cause of action against Merle Van Liere and En-R-G Max, Inc. (collectively referred to as Van Liere), claiming implied contract, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud and deceit. The claims of unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud and deceit were submitted to the jury, while the court directed a verdict on the implied contract claim. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Sporleder for $320,000 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. 1

[¶ 2] We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

[…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Dwyer v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Roth v. Farner-Bocken Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Biegler v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Miller v. JacobsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Prairie Lakes Health Care System, Inc. v. WookeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API