Legal Opinion

Blumenfeld v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1974No. Civ. 34572PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EMERSON, J. *

Appellants Blumenfeld, et al., doing business as Bayview Properties, were first contacted by respondent, San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (hereinafter respondent or BCDC) by letter under date of October 7, 1969, with reference to reports that appellants had been engaged in filling of areas subject to tidal action from Richardson Bay. An application by appellants to fill and improve certain marsh properties in the vicinity of Richardson Bay was submitted to respondent on May 11, 1970. A petition in support of this application was submitted on August…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Candlestick Properties, Inc. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Leslie Salt Co. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Southland Mechanical Constructors Corp. v. NixenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Bowman v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API