Southland Mechanical Constructors Corp. v. Nixen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDANIEL, J.
This litigation for legal malpractice arose after plaintiffs, subcontractors for the construction of a government-sponsored housing project, lost their right to receive from the Army Corps of En gineers additional payments for work done on the project. Plaintiffs allege that the defendants, the prime contractor on the project and plaintiffs’ attorneys, were responsible for processing plaintiffs’ claim against the Army, and, essentially, that defendants did nothing, let alone timely, to process plaintiffs’ claim. Because this appeal arises from a judgment entered after an…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Lee v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines PartnershipCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Samuels v. MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.