Shorb by Shorb v. Airco, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Senior District Judge.
Third-party defendants Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz”) and Hospal Medical Corporation (“Hospal”) have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Before discussing these motions, I will briefly review the procedural history of this action.
I
Plaintiff Larry Shorb suffered severe brain damage when the tubing of a Monaghan series 300 D.O. anesthesia ventilator (“series 300 D.O. ventilator”) became disconnected during oral surgery. Plaintiffs sued Aireo, Inc. (“Aireo”), 1 which sold the allegedly defective ventilator. Aireo impleaded three parties: J.J.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Atlantic Northern Airlines, Inc. v. SchwimmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- TRACEY BY TRACEY v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Keselyak v. Reach All, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Conway v. White Trucks, a Div. of White Motor Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- LaFountain v. Webb Industries Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- LaPollo Ex Rel. LaPollo v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.