LaPollo Ex Rel. LaPollo v. General Electric Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Senior District Judge:
Presently before the court in this diversity suit for personal injuries by plaintiff, Charles J. LaPollo, is a motion by defendant Hobart Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“Hobart”) for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Hobart’s motion shall be granted in part and denied in part.
On June 3, 1985, plaintiff, a restaurant employee at defendant Ponderosa, Inc. (“Ponderosa”), suffered burns and other injuries in the course of operating a deep fryer at work. It appears undisputed that the deep fryer, Model No. AK-40, was manufactured and distributed by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- No. 93-5730Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Wilkerson v. CO Porter MacHinery Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Conway v. White Trucks, a Div. of White Motor Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Leo v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Leo v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.