Legal Opinion
Focke, Wilkens & Lange & Scott v. Leon & Blum
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1891No. 3047PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARR, Judge,
Section A.—Appellees Leon & H. Blum, as plaintiffs below, brought suit against appellants on July 24, 1889, and in their amended original petition alleged that on ¡November 27, 1888, Leon So H. Blum brought suit in Henderson County against the firm of Reynolds So Liston on two promissory notes, on which they subsequently recovered judgment for $1920.63, and that at the institution of said suit they caused to be issued in said cause a writ of garnishment against C. T. Scott, a resident of Henderson County, and that said writ was duly served on said Scott on ¡November 27, 1888.
That…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brashear v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Harrell v. Mexico Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
- Connor v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Stiles v. Davis & BartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Cloud v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1846
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Oats v. Dublin National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Elite Towing, Inc. v. LSI Financial Group, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Scaling v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Bank of Commerce v. ElliottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.