Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Greenberg

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 6, 1933No. 5911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is an action brought by an infant, by his guardian ad litem. Jurisdiction depends solely on diversity of citizenship. The residence and citizenship of the infant is the state of New York. The guardian ad litem is an alien. The residence and citizenship of the defendant is the state of New York. This is a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, on the ground that the parties in interest are residents and citizens of the same state, namely, the state of New York.

In an action brought by a guardian who under the laws of the state may sue in his own name, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. EckmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Toledo Traction Co. v. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  3. Woolridge v. McKennaUnited States Circuit Court · 1881
  4. Ruckman v. Palisade Land Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880
  5. Wilcoxen v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. SperlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  2. Horzepa v. DauskiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
  3. Blackwell v. Vance Trucking CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1956
  4. Arnold v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Vallentine v. Taylor Investment Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API