Legal Opinion
Horzepa v. Dauski
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1941No. 2118PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion made on behalf of the defendant.
“1. To dismiss the action and complaint herein because the same fails to state a claim against the defendant upon which relief can be granted.
2. To dismiss the action or in lieu thereof to quash the return of service of summons on the ground that the Court does not have jurisdiction over the persons inasmuch as no guardian ad litem has been appointed for the infant by this Court.
3. To dismiss the action and the complaint herein on the ground that it is in the wrong District because the plaintiffs are aliens, subjects of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Blumenthal v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1897
- Cole v. Franklin Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Merritt v. GreenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson & Co. v. Fremont Cake & Meal Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1949
- Paschal v. North Atlantic & Gulf S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Biaggi v. Corte de Distrito de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
- Blackwell v. Vance Trucking CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1956
- Compania Plomari De Vapores, S. A. v. American Hellenic Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.