Legal Opinion

Ruckman v. Palisade Land Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided March 16, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion by plaintiff to remand.

1Opinion of the CourtNixon, J.

The motion is to remand this suit to the court of chancery of New Jersey, in which proceedings have been taken to remove it into this court under the act of March 3, 1875.

The hill of complaint was filed in that court by Margaret Ruckman, a citizen of the state of New York, wife of Elisha Ruckman, by her next friend, Samuel M. Hopping, a citizen of the state of New Jersey, for the foreclosure of a certain indenture of mortgage to secure the sum of $272,286.75, executed by one John L. Bronnell and wife to the defendant Elisha Ruckman, on various tracts of land in the county of Bergen, and state…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Union Bank v. DodgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ford v. AdkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1941
  2. Thompson v. Chicago, St. P. & K. C. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Voss v. NeineberU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1895
  4. Merritt v. GreenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API