Legal Opinion

Blackwell v. Vance Trucking Company

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided March 5, 1956No. Civ. A. 4857PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL, District Judge.

In this action, which grows out of a collision between two motor vehicles, the defendant, appearing specially, has filed (1) a motion to set aside the service of the summons and complaint, and (2) a motion to dismiss the action for improper venue.

On casual examination it appears that the first of these motions involves the question as to whether the plaintiff has sued the right person rather than a question as to the validity of service. If this be true then the question of whether the action should be dismissed as to the named defendant could not be determined on motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. EckmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Martineau v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  5. Hodges v. Lake Summit Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Garcia Ex Rel. Garcia v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Grey v. Continental Marketing Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
  3. Viaggio v. FieldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
  4. Sypert v. Bendix Aviation CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
  5. Jenkins v. Hearn Vascular Surgery, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API