Los Angeles, Pasadena, & Glendale Railway Co. v. Rumpp
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Action to condemn a right of way over appellant’s premises.
Upon the first trial of this action, by a judgment entered October 6, 1890, damages were awarded the defendant, Minnie Rumpp, as follows: Value of land taken, $75; cost of fencing, $100; damage by severance, $600; total, $775, and costs.
The plaintiff paid the damages into court, and took possession, and constructed its road. The defendant received the money so paid, and, having filed her abandonment of all defenses to the action except her claim to a greater compensation, moved for a new trial, and, her motion having been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of San Francisco v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Stacey v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- Stockton & Copperppolis R.R. v. GalgianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Los Angeles, Pasadena, & Glendale Railway Co. v. RumppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Pool v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. DennisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.