Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 7, 1994No. 11764PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (2).1 The defendant claims that the trial *53court improperly (1) excluded the written statement of an unavailable witness, (2) refused to instruct the jury on a lesser included offense, (3) refused to read back testimony to the jury, (4) permitted the state’s expert witness to testify about ultimate issues of fact, and (5) charged the jury on the meaning of reasonable doubt. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In re TabithaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. Doe v. MarselleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. State v. HansenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. State v. ToccalineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API