Legal Opinion

Coleman Drilling Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Burkburnett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1923No. 2135PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

This suit was brought by the Coleman Drilling Company, a partnership, against the First National Bank of Burk-burnett, to recover funds deposited with the bank and paid out by it on forged checks. The bank pleaded negligence and estoppel on the part of the plaintiffs in that they failed to examine the monthly statements made up by it, wliich were accompanied by checks charged against the account, thus permitting the continuance of the forgeries, which would have been otherwise detected. To this the plaintiffs in turn answered that the bank was negligent in not detecting the forgeries in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Critten v. Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Merchants' National Bank v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. First National Bank v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Weinstein v. National Bank of JeffersonTexas Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Basch v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Tr. & Sav. Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wussow v. Badger State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Herbel v. Peoples State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Greenville Nat. Exchange Bank v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Rudisill Soil Pipe Co. v. First Nat. Bank of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API