Wussow v. Badger State Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed February 10, 1930:
Fowler, J.
The appellant claims that: (1) The court should have directed a verdict in its favor or rendered judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict. And that if it was not so entitled to judgment a new trial should be ordered because (2) the jury’s finding of the bank’s negligence is not supported by the evidence. (3) The court should have submitted to the jury the questions requested by the defendant. (4) The court erred in instructions. (5) Prejudicial reference was made to insurance held by the bank.(1) The duty of a bank in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Critten v. Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Morgan v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. James R. PavloskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Basch v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Tr. & Sav. Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- East Gadsden Bank v. First City Nat. Bank of GadsdenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Monahan v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Onalaska Electrical Heating, Inc. v. SchallerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.