Legal Opinion

Basch v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Tr. & Sav. Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1943No. S. F. 16867PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

For many years the plaintiff, Carlo Basch, owned and operated a retail drugstore—Basch’s Pharmacy— in San Francisco, and since the establishment of such business he had maintained a commercial account in its name with the defendant bank at the main office at No. 1 Powell Street in said city. In May, 1938, he employed as a part-time bookkeeper one Herbert C. Lahr, who thereupon took charge of the office routine matters in connection with his employer’s bank account and faithfully performed his work for the ensuing five months. About the first of November *320of said year Lahr conceived the scheme…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Critten v. Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Morgan v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rubino v. Utah Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Barclay Kitchen, Inc. v. California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API