Legal Opinion

L.A. Gas & Elec. Corp. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1912No. L.A. No. 2865PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Wm. A. Cheney, George P, Adams, and LeBoy M. Edwards, for Appellant. John W. Shenk, City Attorney, E. B. Young, Assistant City Attorney, and Leslie B. Hewitt, for Bespondents.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff brought an action for an injunction to prevent the enforcement against it of ordinance No. 20,000 (New Series), of the city of Los Angeles, and seeking to have that part of said ordinance relating to the gas and electric business of plaintiff declared void. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiff declining to amend, judgment was given against it. From that judgment this appeal is taken.

The objections of appellant to the validity of the ordinance are based generally upon its alleged uncertainty and its supposed contravention of the fourteenth amendment to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Carlson v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Birdsall v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Ex Parte LemonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Davis v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. City of San Jose v. DonohueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. E. A. Hoffman Candy Co. v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Clark v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API