Legal Opinion

Clark v. City of San Pablo

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1969No. Civ. 25189PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

Plaintiffs, the owners and operators of an apartment house consisting of four rental units, have appealed from an adverse judgment in an action in which they seek a declaration that an ordinance of the City of San Pablo, which imposes a license tax on the business of operating an apartment house, is invalid and unenforceable because it unconstitutionally discriminates against plaintiffs and the other owners of apartment houses consisting of four or more rental units by failing to impose a tax on owners and operators of single family, duplex and triplex rental units. In their complaint against…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Gaulden v. KirkSupreme Court of Florida · 1950

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. John Tennant Memorial Homes, Inc. v. City of Pacific GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Harbour Village Apts. v. City of MukilteoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Associated Home Builders of the Greater East Bay, Inc. v. City of NewarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Ladd v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API