Legal Opinion

E. A. Hoffman Candy Co. v. City of Newport Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1932No. Docket No. 626PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Appellant is a California corporation with its principal place of business in the city of Los Angeles. It was engaged in the business of manufacturing candy and confections and selling its products to retail stores in various cities and communities in southern California, conducting this business from its central plant in Los Angeles. Its salesmen solicited and- secured orders from retail merchants which were filled by delivering the merchandise to the purchasers in motor-trucks belonging to appellant and operated over the public highways and city streets.

Respondent City of Newport Beach is a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Kaiser Land and Fruit Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bueneman v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. In Re HartmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Sivertsen v. City of Menlo ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Kelly v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API