Legal Opinion

Schulein v. Hainer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Lyon District Court. Action by Schulein and another against Hainer to recover for goods sold. Verdict and judgment for defendant, at the February term, 1888. The plaintiff brings the case to this court. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought in the district court of Lyon county, on November 19, 1887, by Seigfried Schulein and A. Schulein, partners, as Seigfried Schulein & Co., against D. W. Hainer, for the recovery of $243.85 and interest. The case was tried before the court and a jury, and the verdict and judgment were in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs; and the plaintiffs, as plaintiffs in error, bring the case to this court.

It appears that the plaintiffs were engaged in a wholesale drug, stationery and notion business, at Fort…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. RoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
  2. Pope v. PopeMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
  3. C. M. Henderson & Co. v. Gibbs & AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Hyde v. ElleryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cashion v. Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Wails v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Kansas Moline Plow Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Benjamin v. Welda State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Clingman v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API