Wails v. Farrington
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma Covmtg; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Replevin by Emma L. Farrington against J. C. -Wails and W. F. Essex. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
This is a suit in replevin brought without bond by Emma L. Farrington, defendant in error, in the district court of Oklahoma county, against J. C. Wails and W. F. Essex, plaintiffs in error, for the possession of a certain stock of jewelry, or its value, $2,100. After separate general demurrers to plaintiff’s amended petition filed and overruled, and both had answered, in effect, a general denial, and Essex, that he was an innocent purchaser for value,'there was trial to a jury and verdict- and judgment for plaintiff for the property, or its value, $2,000, and defendants bring the case here.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Root v. FrenchNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Trudo v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Butters v. HaughwoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Durand v. HigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Spira v. Hornthall, Whitehead, Weissman & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Studebaker Bros. Co. of Utah v. WitcherNevada Supreme Court · 1921
- Spaulding v. PolleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Beck v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Higgins v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.