C. M. Henderson & Co. v. Gibbs & Allen
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Lyon Listriet Court. Replevin. The facts are briefly and substantially stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
On September 4, 1884, two actions of replevin were commenced in the district court of Lyon county against C. M. Henderson & Co. for the recovery of certain goods, wares and merchandise, consisting principally of boots and shoes. One of such actions was commenced by Gibbs & Allen, and the other by Creamer Bros. The two actions involved substantially the same questions, and, with the consent of all the parties and the court, were tried together before the court without a jury; and the court in each case found generally in favor of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Root v. FrenchNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Stevens v. . BrennanNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Butters v. HaughwoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Barnard v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Spira v. Hornthall, Whitehead, Weissman & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commercial Nat. Bank v. PirieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Walker v. GoldsmithOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- Wails v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Western Grocer Co. v. AllemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Schulein v. HainerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.