Legal Opinion

Pope v. Pope

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1866PublishedCited by 14 opinions

ERROR to the Circuit Court of Choctaw county. Hon. Win. Cothran, judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHandy, C. J.

*517This was a bill in equity, filed by tbe appellants as creditors of W. M. Pope, for tbe purpose of setting aside two conveyances made by tbe latter, as having been made to binder, delay, or defraud bis creditors. Tbe first was a deed executed to W. P. Brantley as trustee, and embraced certain real and personal property, wbicb was conveyed to secure certain debts due by W. M. Pope to D. B. Nabors & Co. The second was a deed conveying absolutely to ~W. F. Brantley tbe same and other land, and other personal property.

At tbe date of tbe execution of these instruments, a suit at law was pending in…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. HaydenTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Perkins v. SwankMississippi Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Wallace, Elliott & Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. McLeod v. First National BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Wails v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API