Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Hoover

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1978No. 20725PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Appellant Merilee Dawn Hoover brought this action under the provisions of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act [URESA], Section 20-7-110, et seq., 1976 Code of Laws of South Carolina against respondent Herbert Lynwood Hoover, Jr. for support for herself and the parties’ two infant children. The lower court found that Mr. Hoover owed a duty of support to his children but conditioned that duty on Mrs. Hoover permitting the children, who reside with her in Michigan, to visit Mr. Hoover in South Carolina.

The issue on appeal is whether the lower court had jurisdiction…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vecellio v. VecellioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. State v. FunderburkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Thibadeau v. ThibadeauCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Pifer v. PiferCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Grosse v. GrosseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Byard v. BylerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Todd v. PochopSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Brown v. TurnbloomMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Chet Adams Co. v. James F. Pederson Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. In re ByardOhio Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API