Legal Opinion

Todd v. Pochop

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1985No. 14578PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

This is our first encounter with the issue raised by this appeal. It is whether a custodial parent’s failure or refusal to provide a noncustodial parent with visitation rights may be raised as an equitable defense in a Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) action. SDCL ch. 25-9A. The trial court held that it was. We reverse.

In view of our holding, we do not deem a full recitation of the facts particularly relevant or necessary. Suffice it to say that the custodial parent engaged in grievous and at times contemptuous interference with appellee’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Daly v. DalySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Kramer v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Daly v. DalyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. County of Clearwater, Minn. v. PetrashSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. Ibach v. IbachArizona Supreme Court · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Stach v. StachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hershey v. HersheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hoyle v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Regynski v. State Ex Rel. RegynskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API