Todd v. Pochop
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.
This is our first encounter with the issue raised by this appeal. It is whether a custodial parent’s failure or refusal to provide a noncustodial parent with visitation rights may be raised as an equitable defense in a Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) action. SDCL ch. 25-9A. The trial court held that it was. We reverse.
In view of our holding, we do not deem a full recitation of the facts particularly relevant or necessary. Suffice it to say that the custodial parent engaged in grievous and at times contemptuous interference with appellee’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Daly v. DalySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Kramer v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Daly v. DalyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- County of Clearwater, Minn. v. PetrashSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Ibach v. IbachArizona Supreme Court · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stach v. StachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Hershey v. HersheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Thompson v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Hoyle v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Regynski v. State Ex Rel. RegynskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.